by Sgt. 1st Class Hoyle J. Shaw Jr., U.S. Army
The views presented in this essay are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Department of Defense, Department of the Army, or their components.
The issue of toxic leadership, which is a prevalent problem among military units, requires a sophisticated and strategic approach in order to be mitigated. This is because the problem is ubiquitous. The objective of this article is to give a detailed analysis of the process of building a leadership strategy with the idea of tackling toxic leadership within the military. This analysis will be presented in the form of a section. In particular, we will be paying close attention to the intricate link that exists between the chain of command, the many forms of leadership, and the process of execution. Real-world examples will be rigorously weaved throughout the discussion in order to provide practical insights into how such a plan may be effectively implemented by army leadership. This will happen in order to offer practical insights. This selection of samples will be made from a wide range of different military settings.
Understanding Toxic Leadership and its disruption of the Chain of Command
When it comes to developing a leadership strategy that is effective, it is necessary to have a comprehensive understanding of toxic leadership and its capacity to disrupt the established hierarchy that exists within military units. Micromanagement, harsh communication, and partiality are all behaviors that have the potential to drastically damage the cohesion of a unit as well as its success in missions. Imagine a scenario in which a commanding officer often chooses to criticize subordinates in public rather than providing constructive feedback in private. As a result of this behavior, the trust that exists between leaders and their subordinates is eroded, and the effectiveness of the command structure is significantly diminished.
There are far-reaching impacts that toxic behaviors have, including the impediment of communication, the stifling of initiative, and the lowering of morale in the workplace. When served in an environment that is characterized by public criticism, soldiers are less likely to voice their concerns, provide innovative ideas, or carry out their responsibilities in their entirety. As a result of this loss of confidence and open communication, it is possible that it will extend across the whole chain of command, which will impede the flow of information and put the overall performance of the unit in danger.
An approach to leadership should be developed in order to recognize and control toxic behavior at an early level in order to address this challenge appropriately. In order to do this, it is necessary to not only recognize potentially dangerous behaviors but also devise strategies for early detection and intervention. The strategy needs to place an emphasis on the establishment of a robust framework within which harmful behaviors may be identified and swiftly addressed.
In order to effectively combat toxic influences inside the chain of command, a leadership strategy should go beyond theoretical principles and include concrete activities for identifying and addressing challenges at an early stage. The construction of a system for reporting in confidence is an example of the sort of activity that is being discussed here. In this system, soldiers have the ability to raise concerns about potentially dangerous behavior in an anonymous manner. Through this program, soldiers of varying grades are able to swiftly identify and address difficulties, so contributing to the development of a culture that values accountability and transparency.
Imagine for a moment that a military unit successfully constructed a secret reporting process in order to limit the amount of toxic leadership. It was strongly recommended to the soldiers in this unit that they make use of the system in order to report instances of toxic behavior without fear of face punishment. It was essential for the soldiers to have a channel through which they could express their concerns, and the reporting system ensured that the leadership was aware of potentially destructive activities at an early development stage. Because of this degree of transparency, leaders were able to take preventative actions, such as giving treatment, mentorship, or remedial action, in order to address dysfunctional behavior before it became more severe.
The efficiency of this reporting system was not just dependent on its existence; rather, it was also dependent on the culture that was there. The importance of the system was highlighted by the leaders, and they gave the soldiers the assurance that their reports would be processed in a confidential manner and in a timely manner. Soldiers had a sense of self-assurance while utilizing the system, which assisted in identifying and correcting potentially harmful actions inside the unit in a proactive manner.
In the course of additional investigation into this real-world situation, it becomes clear that the reporting system not only assisted in the identification of potentially hazardous actions, but it also played a significant role in the establishment of an environment in which the soldiers felt that they were being listened to and supported. The processes that are used in the reporting system, the difficulties that were experienced during its implementation, and the implications that were seen inside the military unit will all be thoroughly investigated in the case study. As a result of analyzing the complexities of this successful intervention, the leadership plan is provided with useful insights that may be modified and used in a variety of different military situations.
Leadership Styles: Shaping Organizational Culture
It is necessary to conduct a comprehensive investigation in order to have an understanding of the ways in which leadership styles influence corporate culture and the incidence of toxic leadership. The styles of leadership are more than simply managerial skills; they also serve as cultural designers, defining the mood for the whole organization. A comprehensive grasp of the ways in which various leadership styles may either relieve or intensify toxic leadership in military units can be obtained by doing an examination of these styles using examples from the actual world.
Take into consideration the leader who promotes open and honest communication, values a diverse range of perspectives, and fosters a spirit of collaboration. Through the use of this leadership method, the group is able to create an atmosphere that is encouraging and comprehensive. This leader fosters an environment that is conducive to good workplace culture by encouraging free communication of ideas and making certain that everyone feels heard and valued. By encouraging subordinates to speak out against any symptoms of toxicity, a healthy culture acts as a barrier against toxic leadership behaviors. This is accomplished by maintaining a positive culture.
Imagine what it would be like to have a leader who, instead, adopts a strong or dictatorial style. Through the suppression of creativity and the generation of animosity among workers, this strategy may inadvertently contribute to the promotion of toxicity. An environment that is characterized by top-down instructions, restricted communication channels, and underappreciation of individual efforts is ideal for the growth of toxic leadership. It is more probable that toxic behavior from superiors will have a negative impact on subordinates who have a sense of disengagement and a lack of appreciation for their work.
Within the framework of the leadership strategy, it is essential to make use of real-life examples of wonderful leaders who have established cultures that are positive. The examples are representative of important case studies that illustrate how certain leadership styles contribute to the improvement of the health of work environments. As a preventive strategy, leadership training programs have to include in-depth studies of well-known military commanders who are recognized for their ability to make ethical decisions and demonstrate concern for others.
Take a look at a case study that examines the transformational leadership that a military commander displayed during a situation that was very important. Not only was this commander able to effectively fulfill the target, but he also had the ability to cultivate a positive and resilient culture inside the unit via the use of inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized concern. In order to draw practical concepts that may be included into the leadership strategy, the whole study of this practical case is planned to be carried out.
We will conduct an in-depth analysis of this case study, taking into consideration a variety of points of view. This comprises the specific leadership qualities that were shown, the challenges that were faced along the course of the important mission, and the impact that the commander’s approach had on the overall morale and performance of the unit. In addition to this, the inquiry will look at the long-term effects on the cohesion of the unit as well as the prevention of detrimental leadership behaviors. This helps to give a strong foundation for the leadership plan that is based on the experiences of leaders who have effectively handled challenging conditions and fostered healthy cultures within their teams. The study of successful instances helps to offer this basis.
It is possible that the leadership plan would have interactive components such as role-playing scenarios. These features will provide current and future leaders with the opportunity to apply lessons learned from real-world scenarios to their own problems. This proactive approach facilitates the dissemination of academic material and provides a practical understanding of the ways in which certain leadership styles may be used to prevent hazardous behaviors.
Execution Process: Integrating the Leadership Plan
The success of a leadership strategy is strongly dependent on the seamless integration of that plan into the standards and procedures that are already in place within the military. It is of the utmost importance to successfully execute the strategy, and it is required to take a comprehensive approach in order to guarantee that it will become an essential component of the company. This integration may be accomplished in a number of ways, one of which is by including the leadership plan into all of the normal military training programs, particularly the leadership development classes.
It is possible to employ leadership development courses as a means of introducing and reinforcing the principal ideas included within the leadership plan throughout the course of regular training sessions. The courses provide a controlled environment in which soldiers, both those who are already in charge and those who are aspiring to leadership posts, may take part in intensive role-playing scenarios. In order to assist participants in acquiring practical skills in recognizing and addressing toxic behaviors, the scenarios are designed to imitate toxic leadership situations.
There are two reasons why role-playing scenarios are useful. Soldiers have the opportunity to use theoretical knowledge within a situation that is both simulated and realistic, so enhancing their ability to navigate complex interpersonal relationships. In the second place, it fosters a proactive approach toward dealing with detrimental behaviors, which in turn provides the soldiers with the self-assurance and capabilities necessary to properly intervene for the situation. By including the soldiers in these scenarios, the leadership plan transforms into a practical instrument for the troops, going beyond the realm of theory.
During the execution process, communication and transparency are two components that are very necessary. When it comes to properly conveying the goals and objectives of the leadership plan across all levels of the military hierarchy, leaders play a critical role. An approach to communication that is open and transparent, in which leaders openly describe the goals and procedures for executing the plan, contributes to the development of a shared understanding across the organization.
When specific examples of successful implementation are shared, the plan is transformed from a simple set of instructions into a handbook that is both practical and attainable for leaders at all levels. Examples are provided that give powerful representations of the effectiveness of the plan, presenting concepts that are realistic and connect with the experiences of members of the armed military. These incidents may be used by leaders to emphasize the favorable benefits of the approach, which can help to develop a sense of shared ownership and devotion among the members of the group.
Within the framework of the leadership plan, an exhaustive case study will be investigated in order to give a representative illustration of successful integration. The purpose of this case study is to investigate how a military unit successfully adopted a leadership plan into its training program, which resulted in changes in leadership behavior that were both obvious and helpful. The inquiry will contain the activities that were carried out throughout the integration process, the challenges that were encountered, and the measurable outcomes that were seen inside the unit.
The case study will demonstrate how the leadership plan was seamlessly included into the existing training modules, the techniques that were taken to increase the level of active participation from the soldiers, and the feedback mechanisms that were utilized to assess the efficacy of the plan. It is important to examine the success stories of leaders who actively executed the principles of the plan and witnessed positive benefits in their respective units. The leadership plan is made more believable and relevant by doing an in-depth analysis of this case study. This analysis also serves as a model for other military units to follow in order to effectively adopt and execute the plan.
Chain of Command as a Catalyst for Prevention and Intervention
The hierarchy is crucial in avoiding and dealing with toxic leadership in military units. Within this dynamic structure, hierarchical connections provide authority and accountability, with the chain of command acting as a potent mechanism to recognize, address, and correct harmful behaviors. An example where a mid-level officer recognizes indications of toxic conduct in a superior demonstrates how the chain of command may effectively combat toxicity.
Imagine a scenario in which a mid-level officer identifies troubling indications of toxic conduct in a superior. The leadership strategy, strategically incorporated into military operations, would provide precise instructions on how subordinates might politely voice concerns via proper channels. This methodical strategy enables the mid-level officer to handle the matter effectively while maintaining professionalism and following military regulations.
The leadership plan provides clear instructions on the proper and courteous ways to address problems, ensuring that the intervention process stays positive and productive. The plan establishes a structure for communication among different levels of authority, enabling a balance between responsibility and preserving the organizational hierarchy. This component is essential for creating an atmosphere where concerns about toxic conduct may be expressed without fear of retaliation, encouraging a culture of transparency and responsibility.
Integrating successful interventions’ experiences into the strategy enhances its practicality and motivation. The case study in the plan may focus on a scenario in which a toxic leader received therapy and mentoring, leading to a good change. This practical example demonstrates the effectiveness of the strategy, showing that involvement may result in significant changes in a leader’s behavior.
The strategy demonstrates that combating toxic leadership is not just a theoretical idea but an actual reality by highlighting these success examples. When soldiers in the chain of command use the tools from the plan, they may effectively help avoid and address toxic behaviors. This boosts morale and inspires confidence in military troops by showing the organization’s dedication to fostering a positive and effective leadership environment.
Real-life examples in the leadership plan might include situations when the hierarchy successfully acted to address harmful conduct, demonstrating the plan’s effectiveness in practice. These examples may include instances when leaders at different levels effectively recognized, addressed, and corrected harmful behaviors, thereby maintaining unit cohesiveness and mission effectiveness. An extensive analysis of these effective treatments is crucial for gaining a detailed knowledge of the encountered problems and used techniques.
The research will focus on communication methods in interventions, the significance of counseling and mentoring programs, and the coordination across various levels of the chain of command. The strategy acquires practical insights for future execution and modification by analyzing successful interventions in detail. Furthermore, it highlights that a well-designed strategy may empower the chain of command to cultivate a leadership culture that values responsibility, development, and positive change.
Assessment and Continuous Improvement
To ensure the durability and efficacy of the leadership plan, it is essential to have a comprehensive system for evaluation and continual development. This system should exemplify a dedication to agility and responsiveness to the always shifting military situation.
Additionally, the strategy recommends for a proactive approach to evaluation, which would include the use of a variety of instruments, including as surveys, to collect input directly from troops. These evaluations serve as essential barometers, making it possible to measure the influence that the strategy has had on toxic behavior and the general dynamics of leadership. One of the most important success stories is the hypothetical situation in which a unit reports a considerable decrease in the number of occurrences of toxic conduct after the initiative has been implemented. Not only does it demonstrate that the plan is effective, but it also serves as a useful example for other units, demonstrating the many beneficial results that have been achieved as a direct consequence of its implementation.
A viewpoint that is focused on the future is encouraged within the plan, with an emphasis placed on the need for continuous review. Reviewing the strategy on a regular basis is an important component that ensures it continues to be applicable in the face of ever-evolving problems and shifting conditions in the military environment. Through the use of this iterative method, executives are able to swiftly recognize developing concerns and change the strategy appropriately. Through the adoption of a mentality that is focused on continuous development, the plan presents itself as a resource that is both adaptable and dynamic, able to solve new difficulties that were not anticipated.
The dynamic aspect of the plan is brought to the forefront via the use of instances from the real world. These examples illustrate how various units react to changing conditions and exhibit effective changes that have been implemented. It is possible to provide concrete examples of how adaptation helps to sustained success by including these instances within the strategy. A wide and practical grasp of continuous improvement may be gained via the use of these examples, which might include anything from the incorporation of new technology to modifications in training approaches.
The purpose of case studies is to provide thorough narratives that delve into units that continually analyze and improve their leadership strategies in response to changing conditions. The study that is included inside these case studies goes beyond the surface observations that are made, and instead investigates the minute aspects of measurement instruments and feedback processes. It is possible to augment the plan with practical insights by relying on the experiences of military units that are actively engaged in continuous improvement. This provides a model for other military units to follow.
It is ensured that a full grasp of the feedback mechanisms, assessment tools, and the iterative nature of continuous improvement is established by the detailed analysis that is included in the plan. Through the use of examples that illustrate the development of effective leadership plans throughout the course of time, the plan transforms into a reservoir of knowledge. Not only does it transcend the function of a static guideline, but it also transforms into a dynamic resource that grows in sync with the constantly shifting terrain of military leadership. As a result of this dedication to continual development, the plan frames itself as a framework that is both long-lasting and adaptive, and it is prepared to confront the problems of the future head-on.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the leadership plan that has been provided is an all-encompassing and holistic approach that has been intended to successfully combat toxic leadership inside the army. In addition to navigating the complex dynamics of the chain of command, leadership styles, and the execution process, it also serves as a living document. With this all-encompassing perspective, the strategy intends to equip leaders at all levels with the tools necessary to resist toxic leadership and develop a culture of good leadership inside the military.
The comprehensive character of the approach is made clear by the fact that it takes into account that there are many different aspects that contribute to toxic leadership. In order to acknowledge the essential role that hierarchical structures play in either encouraging or alleviating toxic behaviors, the strategy takes into account the complexities of the chain of command. Concurrently, the strategy investigates the wide range of leadership styles, recognizing the significant influence that these styles have on the culture of the business. Putting an emphasis on the execution process highlights how important it is to integrate it seamlessly into the military processes that are already in place, which ensures that it is applicable in practice.
In order to serve as guiding lights, real-world examples have been included into the strategy. These examples provide concrete instances of effective interventions and positive leadership developments. These instances are not only anecdotes; rather, they serve as examples of inspiration and benchmarks, demonstrating that combatting toxic leadership is not a goal that is unattainable but rather a reality that can certainly be achieved. A commitment to constructive leadership practices among military commanders is inspired by the plan, which does this by highlighting specific instances in which successful techniques were used.
References
Chemers, M. M., Watson, C. B., & May, S. T. (2000). Dispositional affect and leadership effectiveness: A comparison of self-esteem, optimism, and efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265001
Department of the Army. (2021, March 9). Toxic leadership . Toxic Leadership. https://www.defenseculture.mil/Human-Relations-Toolkit/Toxic-Leadership/#:~:text=What%20is%20Toxic%20Leadership%3F,of%20the%20Army%2C%202017).
HANNAH, S. T., WALUMBWA, F. O., & FRY, L. W. (2011). Leadership in action teams: Team leader and members’ authenticity, authenticity strength, and Team Outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 771–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01225.x
Harvard Business and Leadership . (2024, February 16). Understanding leadership. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2004/01/understanding-leadership
NCO Guide. AUSA. (2020, January 8). https://www.ausa.org/nco-guide
Reed, G. E., & Bullis, R. C. (2009). The impact of destructive leadership on senior military officers and civilian employees. Armed Forces & Society, 36(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327×09334994
The cost of tolerating toxic behaviors in the Department of Defense Workplace. Army University Press. (2019). https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/July-August-2019/Williams-Toxic-Behavior/
Thomas, T. A., Gentzler, K., & Salvatorelli, R. (2016). What is toxic followership? Journal of Leadership Studies, 10(3), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21496
Understanding toxic and counterproductive leadership. Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. (2022, November 13). https://www.ucmj-defender.com/understanding-toxic-and-counterproductive-leadership/
VanDyke, Maj. R. (2023, February 28). Take on toxic commanders. AUSA. https://www.ausa.org/articles/take-toxic-commanders
_____________________________
Sergeant First Class Hoyle J. Shaw Jr. is a Military Police Senior Noncommissioned Officer. He has served in every leadership position from Correctional Specialist to Platoon Sergeant. He is currently assigned as the Directorate of Operations Platoon Sergeant for an 85-person platoon within the United States Disciplinary Barracks Battalion (Corrections), the only maximum-security prison in the Department of Defense. His civilian education includes an associate’s degree from Purdue Global University in Criminal Justice and a Bachelor of Arts in Homeland Security and Public Safety Administration from the University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC).
As the Voice of the Veteran Community, The Havok Journal seeks to publish a variety of perspectives on a number of sensitive subjects. Unless specifically noted otherwise, nothing we publish is an official point of view of The Havok Journal or any part of the U.S. government.
Buy Me A Coffee
The Havok Journal seeks to serve as a voice of the Veteran and First Responder communities through a focus on current affairs and articles of interest to the public in general, and the veteran community in particular. We strive to offer timely, current, and informative content, with the occasional piece focused on entertainment. We are continually expanding and striving to improve the readers’ experience.
© 2024 The Havok Journal
The Havok Journal welcomes re-posting of our original content as long as it is done in compliance with our Terms of Use.