What Happens When Car Accident Lawyers Challenge Police Accident Reports?

Photo by Ilja Nedilko on Unsplash

In San Diego, car accidents are common, as they are across California. The popular freeways, such as I-805 and I-5, experience an increased number of car crashes annually. Right after a collision, the police accident reports are typically one of the initial documents that are assessed by the legal teams and police accidents. Even though these reports are authentic, they aren’t always precise and complete. Officers come after the crash and depend on limited observations.

• It’s possible to dispute police reports

Police accident reports contain a great deal of information, but they do not necessarily represent the definitive conclusion on liability. There may be missing information in the report due to inclement weather, congested roadways, an uncooperative driver, or conflicting statements from witnesses. Other inaccuracies may include a diagram that is incorrect and inaccurate assumptions about the speed of the vehicles involved. There can also be misinterpretation of the extent of an injury sustained by victims in the accident. When there are many vehicles involved in an accident, or a serious injury or death, these omissions create the possibility for liability allocation errors.

• Importance of car crash lawyers

Anyone searching for a car accident attorney near me is likely dealing with police accident reports that unfairly blame them. A car accident attorney can take the time to review a police accident report for inconsistencies, unsupported conclusions, and other missing evidence on a line-by-line basis. A challenge to the contents of a police accident report is not an outright dismissal of that document. Instead, it is an effort to put the report in context with all the evidence available so that fault is assigned accurately.

• Managing insurance agencies after contesting reports

Often, an insurance company will use the information in the police report to evaluate the claim. If the police report assigns either partial or complete fault to the victim, the insurer may then assess less than or deny full compensation. Car accident attorneys utilize counter-evidence during the negotiation phase to argue against the police report being used as definitive evidence for settlement purposes. Therefore, allowing victims to receive complete compensation for all losses suffered in the collision. They need not worry that a faulty police report would be considered as the sole reason for their compensation.

• Contesting a police report can alter the case result

The allocation of fault even slightly may have a significant influence on the compensation under California’s comparative fault law. If you can challenge an officer’s report with evidence, then there will be less chance that damages will be reduced or diminished for injuries suffered. The person who has been injured is assured that liability will be determined based upon verified facts. Browse through hhjtrialattorneys.com to learn more about this.

Summing it up

The moment car crash lawyers contest the police crash report, the objective is to provide clarity instead of creating conflict. By reviewing evidence outside the report and correcting mistakes, the lawyers ensure that negligence and fault are decided accordingly. In San Diego, where crashes are challenging, this careful legal assessment can play an essential role in securing the rights of the victims and financial recovery.